Evidence & Procedure III
September 2011 Edition of The Lucas Letter – 1.5 Contact Hours
The case-in-chief is Larsen v. Richardson, Montana 2011. The objective of the retracing surveyor is to find where the boundaries were established on the ground, not to correct it to conform with where the surveyor thinks it should have been established. What happens when the line was never surveyed? There is another evidentiary and procedural problem many surveyors create for themselves, they draw conclusions about the correct location of a boundary and then view the evidence in a way that favors their preconceived notions. See what the courts think about all of this in this edition. This is a Correspondence Course with a 2-Page Letter covering 1 Court Opinion consisting of 26 pages. This 28-Page document has a 10-Question examination based on the text of the newsletter and the case-in-chief. OBJECTIVES: To enhance professional competency and improve practitioner’s knowledge of the law as it relates to the practice of land surveying.
This is a downloadable PDF with an exam at the end. Once the exam is completed and returned a certificate will be sent.