This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Home » Traversing the Law: A well-reasoned opinion
What is a survey of property if not a well-reasoned opinion on the boundaries involved?
As we know from experience, however, many surveys (and surveyors) fall considerably short of this admirable goal. The court cases I read every week are filled with example after example of surveyors who had no intention of giving an opinion on anything but the math they used to solve a supposed boundary problem. I realize that the surveyors who read this column are much like the choir that hears the same sermon every week. But for the few that might be reached and for the more-than-apparent problems that continue to plague the profession, somebody has got to be the bad guy and bring these issues to light.