Most states have established advising and coordinating entities whose charge is to assist state and local government in creating and maintaining productive GIS systems. Almost all U.S. states have established a GIS office and/or GIS advisory council. A GIS office usually serves as the state’s leading GIS agency for the promotion and coordination of GIS activities among the state’s other agencies, including the department of transportation (DOT), the department of environmental protection (DEP), the department of taxation, law enforcement, etc. Some GIS offices also coordinate the GIS activities of non-state agencies, such as GIS user groups, GIS specialty committees and other GIS teams. These offices can benefit from surveyor participation.
Some of the decisions made by the GIS office or the GIS council can have a direct impact on surveyors and the surveying profession as a whole. For example, new standards for parcel mapping or other spatial products such as orthophotos or digital terrain models (DTMs) will have a direct impact on surveyors. If the standards specify who is entitled to provide theses data sets (e.g., any certified GIS professional), the impact will be even greater.
It is therefore essential that surveyors become involved in the activities of their state GIS advisory entities. Surveyors, as individuals or as a group, should participate in the activities of the GIS office and/or council. Individual surveyors can be instrumental in steering these advisory entities in the right direction; however, in some instances they may voice their own opinions (or business interests) on certain issues. These opinions do not always correspond to the general interest of the surveying profession. On the other hand, a surveyor’s society can participate in many more activities and have a consistent voice across the board. These groups can become members of different committees and express surveyors’ views on the matters at hand. They can represent the concerns of the entire profession rather than individual personal views or interests.
While it is important that surveyors as a group become involved in state GIS activities, it is equally important that the involvement has an impact on the GIS community. The visibility of surveyors in GIS activities and the impact of their participation in committee work should be prominent. Otherwise, the surveyors’ perspective will not warrant an effect on the GIS decision-making process. The GIS community should be made aware that when making crucial decisions such as adopting GIS standards or determining who is allowed to do what in GIS, the surveying community must be involved in those decisions. But this will only be achieved if surveyors play a prominent role.
Are Surveyors Involved in GIS?Two recent surveys on the relationship of GIS and surveying reflect the level of surveyors’ involvement in current GIS activities. One of these surveys, which was conducted by the National State Geographic Information Council (NSGIC)1, represents the perspective of the GIS state officers and officials on the involvement and participation of surveyors in state GIS activities. Another survey2, conducted as a mutual collaboration effort between the Geographic and Land Information Society (GLIS) and the National Society of Professional Surveyors (NSPS), represents the surveyor’s perspective on the individual’s involvement and participation in GIS activities. From the perspective of the two different groups, the two surveys determine the level of involvement of surveyors in GIS. Here are some analyses of the two surveys.
The NSGIC StudyAccording to NSGIC, 46 states have a GIS office or council, or both. See Figure 1. This means that in at least 46 states, surveyors should be concerned with the activities of their GIS office/council.
The NSGIC study also found that 18 states with a GIS office and/or council also had a GIS committee within its state society. Maine and South Carolina have a GIS committee but not a GIS office/council. Nine states with a GIS office/council did not know whether there was a GIS committee in their state surveying societies. It is therefore assumed that in at least 50 percent of the country GIS activities take place without the official involvement of the surveying state societies. See Figure 2. Further, only 13 states reported that surveyors actively participate in their meetings and the activities of the GIS office/council. See Figure 3. Because visibility enhances the possibility to be heard and considered, it is important for surveyors to improve their attendance.
According to the NSGIC survey, 14 states have an official seat (with voting privileges) for a surveyor on the GIS council. It is not specified in most cases whether that seat is occupied by a government employee (such as the state surveyor) or by a representative from the state surveying society. Surveying societies in the 36 states that do not have an official seat for a surveyor on the GIS council are encouraged to pursue actions to change this situation.
The NSGIC survey also found that 31 states (plus the District of Columbia) have some form of GIS standards. At the same time, the GLIS/NSPS survey (discussed below) revealed that only 19 state societies have a GIS committee. Even if all 19 states with a GIS committee also have GIS standards, it leaves 12 states where GIS standards are being implemented without the involvement of the GIS committee of that state society. See Figure 4. This situation does not serve the states well nor does it serve the interests of the surveyors in those states.
The GLIS/NSPS SurveyAccording to the GLIS/NSPS survey, the surveyors of 23 states have been required to submit survey products in GIS-compatible formats. In 15 of those 23 states, the surveyor’s state society has a GIS committee. This leaves eight states with GIS submission requirements but no GIS committee to monitor those requirements. See Figure 5.
However, as states, counties and municipalities embark on the creation of a GIS from submitted data, GIS compatibility requirements will become more common. Surveyors should be interested in this trend because it will affect the way they do business with local government. At a minimum, surveyors should be aware of the GIS submission requirements of their states and be able to deliver surveys in that format. This, of course, necessitates surveyors to become educated in GIS.
But, according to the GLIS/NSPS survey, only three states offer hands-on GIS seminars or workshops. See Figure 6. Advanced GIS education is offered in Alaska and 15 states offer beginner and intermediate GIS education. (The other states either did not offer GIS education or did not respond to the survey question.) From these results, it is clear that surveying state societies need to do more to prepare their members for the challenges ahead.
Time to Improve GISThe information contained in this article provides a brief status of GIS-related aspects of state societies and their relation to the surveying profession. The results of the two studies show that surveyors should become involved in their states’ GIS activities as it will have an impact on their professional practice. For surveyors, the interpretation of the acronym “GIS” should be “Get Involved, Surveyors!”
Sidebar: Getting Involved in GISAction items for state societies:
Establish an active GIS committee. The committee should become informed and involved in:
Action items for national societies:
Coordinate nationwide agenda to foster involvement in:
References1. The GLIS/NSPS survey was coordinated and analyzed by the author.
2. The NSGIC survey can be found atwww.nsgic.org/states/index.cfm