Deed Interpretation II
September 2008 Edition of The Lucas Letter – 3.0 Contact Hours
The case-in-chief is Elton v. Davis, Missouri 2003, involving the interpretation of a metes and bounds deed description where the deed doesn’t match the improvements. The secondary and supporting case is Hall v. Staley, North Carolina 2003, where parol evidence became the deciding factor in the proper interpretation of an ambiguous deed. This is a Correspondence Course with a 3-Page Letter covering 2 Court Opinions consisting of 9 pages. This 12-Page document has a 10-Question examination based on the text of the newsletter and the attached cases. OBJECTIVES: To enhance professional competency and improve practitioner’s knowledge of the law as it relates to the practice of land surveying.
This is a downloadable PDF with an exam at the end. Once the exam is completed and returned a certificate will be sent.