Web Exclusive: Closing the Gap

Is today’s education system adequately preparing the surveying and mapping professionals of the future? Here’s a look at what’s needed, where we’re falling short and why it matters to today’s professionals.



According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, surveying offers a promising career. An estimated 31,000 new jobs were expected to be created for qualified surveyors, cartographers, photogrammetrists, and surveying and mapping technicians between 2006 and 2016.1 This figure represents a 21 percent increase, which is much faster than the average for all occupations. While this projection was compiled before the economy took a nosedive, the report notes that “increasing demand for fast, accurate, and complete geographic information will be the main source of growth for these occupations”-and this demand continues to accelerate. New professionals will also be needed to replace workers who retire, which is a growing concern as the average age of surveyors approaches 60.

But here’s an interesting statistic: Between 2000 and 2005, fewer than 1,000 bachelor’s degrees were conferred in these fields-fewer than 200 each year.2 And while official figures aren’t available beyond 2005, it doesn’t appear that the trend has changed all that much. Milton E. Denny, PLS, a surveying course instructor in the College of Engineering at Auburn University in Alabama, estimates that there were fewer than 250 surveying graduates nationwide in 2008.

“We have two major problems,” he says. “One is the lack of educational opportunities-there just aren’t enough schools [offering degrees in this field]. The other is the lack of students, and this is due to a lack of funding [of] both the programs themselves and the efforts to recruit students into the programs.”

These problems aren’t new. So what can be done to close the gap-and does it even matter?


The Technology Conundrum

Some might argue that technology is making the issue irrelevant. Indeed, many of the tasks that once required highly trained and skilled surveyors are now handled by computers and other electronic systems, and new technologies are seemingly designed to operate with little human involvement. But it isn’t quite so simple. “Today’s total stations and GPS instruments are advanced computers with the capability to collect information that can be converted into multiple formats and attached to coordinate systems on the fly,” notes Stacey D. Lyle, PhD, RPLS, associate professor and program coordinator for geographic information science and geospatial surveying engineering at The Conrad Blucher Institute (CBI) for Surveying and Science, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (A&M-CC). “The problem is often that the individuals using the equipment don’t understand how to use it to its fullest advantage.”

According to Lyle, this situation leads to underutilized equipment and missed opportunities for firms that employ inadequately trained workers. For example, recent research by a graduate student at A&M-CC compared laser scan technology with GPS technology on a cross-section application for an erosion control engineering topographic survey. The student conducted and priced the project with both technologies. Under the control of a skilled user, the laser scanner produced a more in-depth topographic map with coverage areas that the GPS would have missed at its cross-section interval. However, the cost of the laser scan was higher. “The product of the laser scan had much more value, but it takes a knowledgeable person to help to convince a client of this fact,” Lyle says. “Additionally, the payoff might have been lower if the scan had been conducted by a field party person versus an RPLS.”

RTK networks provide another example. Lyle notes that while the cost of GPS has leveled off, the ability to use a rover GPS with a network connection to a series of base stations maintained by private and public networks has reduced the overall cost of a base/rover configuration. As a result, the use of GPS for surveying is becoming commonplace. “But network GPS experiences quirks in solutions and communication from time to time,” he says. “Users must be knowledgeable of how the system operates and solves solutions to achieve a better performance level.”

So, as technology advances, so do the education requirements. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics notes that “opportunities will be best for surveyors, cartographers, and photogrammetrists who have a bachelor’s degree and strong technical skills.” That brings us back to the first problem Denny mentioned: Why aren’t there more surveying degree programs?

Educational Resources

Larry G. Crowley, PhD, PE, associate professor of civil engineering at Auburn University, believes a lack of research funding is to blame-and that the public and private sector share the responsibility to change the situation. “Academic programs rely on research,” he says. “As more research funding from public and private sources is awarded to professors for projects in surveying and related fields, this will trickle down and stimulate the development of new academic programs in these areas.”

But simply creating new programs to educate students in the technologies and techniques isn’t enough. The programs must also empower students to develop solutions. “Many students and new graduates today lack critical thinking skills,” says Crowley. “They’re afraid to own the data and offer advice based on their interpretation. Yet that’s exactly what they need to do as professionals. There’s often a disconnect in translating academic learning to actual practice.”

Crowley believes that academic programs must strive to give students the confidence to make decisions-and instilling this confidence requires the involvement of individuals who are actively involved in the surveying profession. Partnerships and collaborations between educators and professionals are key.

Programs such as those at Auburn University and Texas A&M-CC seek to achieve this goal by recruiting professionals to serve as instructors, course advisors and other roles. For example, at Texas A&M-CC, professionals teach field camps-a move that ABET has applauded. Another example of professional involvement is the new geomatics initiative at the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University (OSU). The school recently signed a memorandum of understanding with David Evans and Associates Inc. and Leica Geosystems Inc. that will give students ongoing access to industry experts and hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of state-of-the-art geomatic equipment and software. “We believe that industry and manufacturers should share in the social responsibility to help educational institutions stay on top of new technologies, changing work flow methodology, and new techniques in capturing 3D geospatial data,” says Ken Mooyman, president and CEO of Leica Geosystems. The partnership is also expected to increase geomatics research efforts and lead to the creation of new courses and the hiring of additional faculty in these areas.

It’s a start. But more is still needed throughout the nation to ensure that enough qualified individuals are available to meet the increasing demand for geographic information and its applications.

“Doing nothing is not an option,” Denny says. “Professional surveyors can plot their own future by becoming actively involved in outreach efforts that help recruit new professionals to the field and ensure they are adequately trained. We owe it to ourselves as a way to safeguard our profession.”


What do you think? Please post your comments below or send an e-mail to pobeditor@bnpmedia.com.

Links

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to POB

Pob0413_editor01_new-headshot_0311_300
Christine Grahl is the editor of POB magazine. She can be reached at 248.366.6981.

Recent Articles by Christine Grahl

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Two Problems

Walter Brown, PLS, PE
April 21, 2009
(Originally posted April 01, 2009) As a licensed surveyor in the states of California and Nevada, it is my experience that our profession has intractable problems that must be solved. Why do we think we can attract people who are willing to invest four years of education and at least another two years as an apprentice surveyor before they can enter what is a low paid profession? Among others two seemingly intractable problems must be solved. The first is the lack of integrity on the part of a significant portion of those who are practicing in the field. Two examples: "¢ During the review of subdivision improvements, parcel maps and final maps I have visited sites to confirm that the lot corners have been set. In the majority of cases some, if not all, of the corner monuments were not set. In the case of subdivision improvement inspections most of the maps had been filed at least a year prior to the inspection. When queried the field surveyors (all unlicensed) told me. "We never set the front corners." When I pointed out that the final map showed the corners monumented I got nothing more that shrugged shoulders. When the licensed surveyors called about my question to their crews or about my refusals to release the monumentation bonds I experienced threats and invective. I recognize that monuments can be destroyed during construction and have experienced that, when developers have called me back to reset corners that had been knocked out well after the map had been filed. "¢ While reviewing maps I am awed by the number of surveyors who find ever corner monument and report the distance and bearing with the record and measured dimensions being identical to the hundredth of a foot and second of arc. I've done first order surveying and know the excruciating care that must be taken to achieve that level of work. Those who report that both they, and the original surveyor who set the corners, have achieved such high levels of accuracy humble me with the fantastic levels of skill and great equipment they possess. When you add that they achieved this by setting up in the middle of the property and shot each monument with a single direct position shot I am floored. We must get these people out of the profession. When a starry-eyed graduate comes out of academia and lands his first job with one of these yahoos they will either be poisoned for the rest of their careers, or they will leave it at their first opportunity. The second issue that must be resolved is pay. I am amazed at the number of good people in my profession who will work in a field where they are exposed to everything from vicious dogs, poison oak and lousy weather to threats of lawsuits, map reviews by technicians who don't know the law and have never spent a day in the field and employers who don't meet payday. But when you add that a mechanic at the local brake shop earns more per hour fiddling with your car than you do ... well we must love the work. There's no better explanation for it. Does anyone believe that there would be less work if our fees were higher? What, they're paying you now for the work you do because they like to see tripods on their land? No!, The work is commissioned because the work needs to be done. The fees are low because of the individuals that won't do it right and never intended to do it right. The two issues, integrity and pay are locked together. Low-ball surveyors clinch the problem. Issues such as four-year degrees, GPS, GIS, greater levels of knowledge of the law, understanding that the manual of instruction and special instructions are part and parcel of any public lands survey system boundary, will all fall into place if integrity is embraced as the maxim of our profession and when there is enough money to allow for continued learning and enough time to do the job right.

A Technician's Perspective

Karmely Sutworth
April 21, 2009
(Originally posted April 18, 2009) I would like to comment on this article from a technician's point of view. I agree with everything that was stated and would like to expand these arguments a little. The state I live in has geared their education system in such a way that it's only practical for a student straight out of high school who plans to live on campus. There are no satellite schools or online options, classes are taught during the work week and during the day. So what is a working adult, who has valuable on-the-job experience, to do if they want to further their career? I have seen all of the situations described in the article and it appears, in my 25 years of experience, to be snowballing. Companies hire someone, teach them to be button pushers, call them "party chiefs" when they really have no understanding of the fundamentals of surveying. And then when the next company hires that person and finds them lacking in skills and knowledge, how does that get dealt with? While it is very important to have surveyors with an educational background, I have had to work with far too many who can give all the right answers to a test but whose practical, real-world survey skills were sadly lacking. And yet, as a technician, I'm supposed to do what they say, and they don't usually take it very well when I question decisions they may have made. I would much rather work with older, more experienced surveyors who have learned their profession through mentors, training, and real world experience. The solutions that have been offered are a good first step. I think it would also be good to change the attitudes of those being schooled by emphasizing that their education does not, by itself, prepare them to immediately be in charge, but it does give them the tools to learn their profession. There are way too many coming out of school with the attitude they have arrived when, in reality, they have just begun. And, possibly because of the lack of college graduates mentioned in this article, too many employers are reluctant to correct and critique the work of these graduates. As to my point in the beginning, why are there not more options for working adults? I have seriously considered leaving this field because there are not more opportunities to advance. What that would mean for this profession is the loss of all of my years of experience and the knowledge gained during that time. Technology has changed the landscape of surveying tremendously during the time I have worked, but the fundamentals haven't changed and there needs to be more emphasis on valuing that as the methods continue to advance.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

HxGN Live

More than 3,500 attendees from more than 70 countries attended HxGN Live, the annual Hexagon AB user conference, at the MGM Grand Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas on June 3-6. About 450 keynotes and panel discussions were held, and several companies from around the world exhibited their geospatial products. Here are a few snapshots from the event.

THE MAGAZINE

POB

2013 June BOP cover

2013 June

Check out the latest edition of POB! Read about how laser scans and photogrammetry were used to discover ancient artwork on one of the world's most mysterious landmarks and the benefits of BIM for infrastructure.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Point of Beginning Store

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\POB\epubsite\Statues-pic-large.gif
Surveyor Statues

The perfect gift or award for any special occasion.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications, Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Geo Locator

Buyers Guide

The #1 buyers' guide for land surveyors and geomatics professionals. Search listings for software and equipment manufacturers, equipment dealers and professional services. CLICK HERE to view GeoLocator.

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook logo Twitter logo  LinkedIn logo  YouTube logo