Gravitational Bending of Light

Posted By Lawrence Paul Lopresti on 4/27/2008 at 12:43 PM
 
Gravitational Bending of Light
From an article by Laurence R. Doyle at the SETI Institute
 
“Albert Einstein predicted that the suns gravity should bend the light of background stars, so they would appear to move outward during a solar eclipse.”
 
“This deflection -- about 1/1000th the width of a full moon -- was first measured by the famous British astronomer, Sir Arthur Eddington in 1919. Several years later a group from the Lick Observatory proved that Einstein was correct, by measuring to the required accuracy.”
 
Based on the above and with the following information:
 
Diameter of Earth = De = 12,742 Km
Radius of Earth = Re = 6,371 Km
Mass of the Earth = Me = 5.9736 * 10^24 Kg
 
Diameter of Moon = Dm = 3,746 Km
Radius of Moon = Rm = 1,738 Km
Mass of the Moon = Mm = 7.349 * 10^22 Kg
 
Gravitational Equation
Fg = G (M’M”)/R^2
 
The force of gravity is the Gravitational Constant times Mass 1 times Mass 2 divided by the Radius (distance between the centers of mass).
 
I want to solve for the deflection due to gravity on earth.
 
M’ is the Mass of a Light Particle, M” is the Mass of the Earth/ Moon.
 
Me/Mm = 5.9736 * 10^24 Kg / 7.349 * 10^22 Kg = 81.28
Me = 81.28 Mm
Re/Rm = 6,371 Km / 1,738 Km = 3.666
Re = 3.666 Rm
 
Solving the Gravitational Equation for Fg of the Earth relative to the Moon, G and M’ being constant:
Fge = 81.28 Mm /( 3.666 Rm^2) = 6 Fgm
 
If the force is 6 times greater the deflection should be 6 times greater, therefore the deflection to light as effected by Earth’s gravity is 6/1000 or 0.006
 
The number used to account for refraction is 0.011 Km^2.
 
Let us assume the full effect of gravity occurs when light travels the distance of one Earth diameter. In reality is is over a greater distance abd one would then have to differentiate over that greater distance, I believe one Earth diamter is a fair approximation.
 
The amount due to gravity alone is 0.006 Km^2 or a bit more than half. That leaves 0.005Km^2 to be caused by the effect of the atmospheric density difference.
 
I believe the above to be a sound first assumption upon which further studies may refine the actual value but would not change the scale. That is I am within +/- 50%.
 
Paul in PA
Modified By Lawrence Paul Lopresti on 4/27/2008 at 12:43 PM
 
Click here to read the rest of this thread:
 

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to POB

Recent Articles by Lawrence Lopresti

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

SPAR International 2013

The 10th annual event took place April 15 - 18 at The Broadmoor in Colorado Springs. The conference brings together professionals from around the world to discover the latest advances and technologies in 3D data capture, processing and delivery.

THE MAGAZINE

POB

May 2013 POB cover

May 2013

The May issue of POB features a How-To article on making technology investments pay off as well as a study conducted by BNP Media's Market Research team on salary and benefits.

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Point of Beginning Store

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\POB\epubsite\Statues-pic-large.gif
Surveyor Statues

The perfect gift or award for any special occasion.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications, Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Geo Locator

Buyers Guide

The #1 buyers' guide for land surveyors and geomatics professionals. Search listings for software and equipment manufacturers, equipment dealers and professional services. CLICK HERE to view GeoLocator.

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook logo Twitter logo  LinkedIn logo  YouTube logo