POBOnline
  Home
  Advertise
  Subscribe
  RPLS.com Community
  eNews Subscription
  eNews Archive
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online Updates
  Latest News
  Calendar of Events
  Call for Papers
  Webinars
  On the Money Podcasts
  Fun + Games
  New Products
  Association Headlines
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Resources
  Archives
  Career Center
  Classified Ads
  Classified Listings
  Digital Edition Archives
  Distance Education
  Geo Locator Buyers Guide
  Industry Links
  Product Showcase
  Market Research
  POB Store
  POB Info
  Special Collections
  GIAA Mailbag/Tool Tips
  GPS Observer Series
  Site Prep
  Surveying GIS
  Surveyor + the Law
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Send your news to brumma@bnpmedia.com.
Javad Protests PNT EXCOM Conclusion on LightSquared

January 25, 2012

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



In a Jan. 24 letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski and NTIA Assistant Secretary Lawrence E. Strickling, Javad Ashjaee, CEO of Javad GNSS, shared his dissatisfaction with the recent conclusion by the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) Executive Committee (EXCOM) regarding LightSquared. “I’m disgusted by the scientific farce propagated by the PNT Executive Committee in declaring that LightSquared’s interference issues could not be resolved,” Ashjaee said in his letter. “That conclusion was produced by a fraudulent round of testing, conducted with the goal of orchestrating end-results that protected an unholy alliance of GPS manufacturers and government end-users. It was a testing process where political influence trumped objective engineering. It was a process where conflicts of interest trumped science. It was a testing process where financial interests blocked consumer innovation instead of fueling it.”

Ashjaee said the second round of testing was conducted secretly rather than through an open and collaborative process because, he said, “PNT and GPS makers … were afraid of the results.” He argued for further investigation. “This collusion begs for a close examination by reasonable, fair-minded public servants with the public’s best interest at heart,” he said. “It is not factually correct for the PNT to state that the technology does not exist because I have proven that indeed it does. The PNT refused to even conduct its own tests on the high precision units. The results from the independent Alcatel-Lucent lab alone warrant a close examination of my proposed solution.”

A complete copy of the letter can be found on Javad's website.


|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.
















BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy